I’ll be honest, I’ve never been a fan of unions. (No surprise from a conservative blog!) Growing up with family in and out of unions, my general experience was that union work tended to be more expensive for shoddier work. In the construction industry, the union carpenters (e.g.) would have more leverage for securing larger jobs even though it was widely known that their work was of lesser quality. So from personal experience, I come at the issue not from the “greedy” corporate raiders side but the “greedy” small business owner competing against a powerful union.
I’ve also never had any desire or pressure to join a union. I work at a small, religious institution with no union. If I had to guess, I’d say that roughly half (perhaps a bit more) of the faculty are Republicans and Libertarians and the other half are Democrats. And I’ve never heard the Democrats make a case for unions at our school. Why not? Because we all know the administrators and know that the explanations for our low salaries are mostly not due to greed and an unwillingness to pay us more. They want to pay us more and think we’re worth paying more. Union dues would only mean that we have less take-home pay.
The main reason I’ve never liked unions is because of their overwhelming support for Democrats and Democratic issues beyond support for unions (not to mention corruption, the mafia, etc.). So it’s particular unions such as the NEA that make me inclined not to support them.
However, I can’t see why a conservative should be against them in principle. Unions, like corporations, are (or at least can be) free associations in which citizens come together for a common cause. (See also A Libertarian Case for Organized Labor?) If citizens should be allowed to incorporate, so too should they be allowed to unionize.
At least to a point. Public-sector (government) unions are a different animal, and there are good reasons for conservatives to oppose them. Beyond the fact that many public-sector union members live high on the tax funded hog, the status of a unionized employee changes with respect to ordinary citizens for the worse. For non-unionized, elected officials, we the people set out what we take their responsibilities to be, salary, and so on. If elected officials and their cohorts unionize, they are now beholden to the union bosses and are one more step away from being accountable to the people who elected them. Since the government already has a monopoly on force and basic utilities, a unionized government can now effectively strike (along with the bloated bureaucracies) bringing non-public sector citizens to their collective knees when it comes to receiving vital services. As such, those on the right should oppose them.
- Guest Post: In Defense of Autocracy - April 17, 2017
- Equal Opportunity and Justice - March 17, 2017
- The New Jim Crow Chapter 1: The Rebirth of Caste - March 6, 2017
- Pro-Birth, Pro-Life, Whole-Life, and Pro-Torture - February 2, 2017
- Virtue and Killing and Eating Animals: A Response to Catholic Hulk - January 14, 2017
- “Baby it’s Cold Outside”: Consent, Commitment, Sex, and Leftist Prudes - December 24, 2016
- Follow Us on Twitter - December 3, 2016
- Expert Philosophy Journalist Leiter Tries to Smear Rightly Considered Again: But It’s an Abject Failure - November 2, 2016
- Leiter Retort - October 28, 2016
- Society of Biblical Literature Bans IVP Over LGBTQQIETC - October 19, 2016