A former police officer, AR-15 (or “AR”) knows the difference between an assault rifle and home defense rifle. AR now fights with other weapons and demolishes arguments. He agrees that the pen is mightier than the sword, but he isn’t so stupid to bring a pen to a gunfight.
Sorry off topic, but wanted to share this gem and wasn’t sure where to drop it. It’s sort of a basket of deplorables link refuting the erstwhile Jihadist violence apologists, and it does its job very well:
Thanks. I saw that before and wanted to find it again.
Glad to be of service AR, here’s another piece, an op-ed, that says in layman’s terms what I jeep thinking: “why do so few call the Islamic camel in the room an Islamic camel?”
Why do politicians and pundits by and large fail to call the spade of Islamism a spade? Is it because the Islamists and the liberals occupy the same basic political geography against the conservative Judeo-Christian worldview?
If self-proclaimed fundamentalist Christians formed a global coalition of terror cells and systematically perpetrated these same acts in the name of Jesus, would the libs bend over backwards to avoid any association between the terrorists and the word “Christian”?
I know my scenario is an alternate universe, but still…
Is it Stockholm Syndrome? Is there a philosophical diagnosis to this bizarre failure of basic logic to identify a deadly enemy and take action? Islam is like the religious version of the Borg in Star Trek. It can’t be appeased. It can’t be satisfied until you are either dead, or assimilated. That’s its stated goal. That’s is reason for being. Read the literature. Look at history.